Feature: Additional Default Receivers for Mail

If you need any help in filling out this wiki page, please visit our ILIAS Community FAQ. And please complete the metadata information in the right column after having created the page.

1 Initial Problem

In the previous proposal to enhance the "Inform per Mail" feature, only the participant will be
included in the "To:" field. Depending on the circumstances, other users may also require to be
informed by default, such as superiors or higher supervisors. These should be included in the "To:"
field automatically.

2 2 Conceptual Summary

The settings of an Individual Assessment shall include a Tag
Input Field with the label "Default Info Mail Receivers." This field will allow the user to select
every role that is active in the current location of the Individual Assessment and every position
that is available in the system. When the mail compose form to "Inform via Mail" is opened, the
"To:" field will contain the Participant and any users that have the selected roles, as well as all
users. Please note that each user will only be included once, even if they fulfil the criteria for
multiple roles or positions

3 User Interface Modifications

3.1 List of Affected Views

• … { Please list titles of all views (screens) of ILIAS that should be modified, newly introduced or removed. }

3.2 User Interface Details

{ For each of these views please list all user interface elements that should be modified, added or removed. Please provide the textual appearance of the UI elements and their interactive behaviour. }

3.3 New User Interface Concepts

{ If the proposal introduces any completely new user interface elements, you might consult UI Kitchen Sink in order to find the necessary information to propose new UI-Concepts. Note that any maintainer might gladly assist you with this. }

3.4 Accessibility Implications

{ If the proposal contains potential accessibility issues that are neither covered by existing UI components nor clarified by guidelines, please list them here. For every potential issue please either propose a solution or write down a short risk assessment about potential fallout if there would be no solution for the issue. }

4 Technical Information

{ The maintainer has to provide necessary technical information, e.g. dependencies on other ILIAS components, necessary modifications in general services/architecture, potential security or performance issues. }

5 Privacy

{ Please list all personal data that will need to be stored or processed to implement this feature. For each data point, provide a short explanation of why it is necessary to use that data. You may consult the Privacy Clinic for questions regarding the legality, minimization, or appropiate use of personal data in compliance with applicable privacy regulations such as GDPR. }

6 Security

{ Does the feature include any special security relevant changes, e.g. the introducion of new endpoints or other new possible attack vectors. If yes, please explain these implications and include a commitment to deliver a written security concept as part of the feature development. This concept will need an additional approvement by the JourFixe. }

7 Contact

• Author of the Request: {Please add your name.}
• Maintainer: {Please add your name before applying for an initial workshop or a Jour Fixe meeting.}
• Implementation of the feature is done by: {The maintainer must add the name of the implementing developer.}

8 Funding

If you are interest in funding this feature, please add your name and institution to this list.

• …

9 Discussion

10 Implementation

{ The maintainer has to give a description of the final implementation and add screenshots if possible. }

Test Cases

Test cases completed at {date} by {user}

• {Test case number linked to Testrail} : {test case title}

Privacy

Information in privacy.md of component: updated on {date} by {user} | no change required

Approval

Approved at {date} by {user}.