Show Advanced KnowledgeHide Advanced Knowledge

Competence Recommendations Hide Materials for Already Achieved Levels

1 Initial Problem

By now (v5.2.x), users viewing their competences receive recommendations for all existing levels of a competence.
However, in fact they don't need recommendations for levels they have already achieved.

2 Conceptual Summary

Only those materials should be displayed to users which are related with competence levels still to be achieved.
As there might be different (and varying) results concerning the currently achieved level, the rule we suggest for displaying materials is:
From the lowest actually achieved level of the user (upwards) +1.

Example:
In the case of a specific user, the following levels are displayed in a competence "English Grammar" (existing levels from 1 = beginner to 6 = native speaker):

• 3 by self-assessment
• 3 by a 360 ° feedback (external assessment)
• 4 by test (external assessment)

There is separate learning material for each competence level, i.e. 6 materials.
With the new filter, the learner would only receive recommendations for the learning materials of level 4 to 6,
because level 3 is the lowest actually achieved level and level 4 is the next higher one that can be achieved.

3 User Interface Modifications

3.1 List of Affected Views

• "Personal Desktop > My Competences"
• "Personal Desktop > My Competences > Competence Profiles" (yet to be introduced, s. Show Profile-Scheduled Competence Levels on Personal Desktop)
• Competence results in Tests (from the learner's perspective)
• Competence results in 360° feedback surveys (from the learner's perspective)

3.2 User Interface Details

3.3 New User Interface Concepts

4 Technical Information

{The maintainer has to provide necessary technical information, e.g. dependencies on other ILIAS components, necessary modifications in general services/architecture, potential security or performance issues.}

5 Contact

• Author of the Request: 
• Maintainer: {Please add your name before applying for an initial workshop or a Jour Fixe meeting.}
• Implementation of the feature is done by: {The maintainer must add the name of the implementing developer.}

6 Funding

If you are interest in funding this feature, please add your name and institution to this list.

• Handelkompetent
• Qualitus

7 Discussion

8 Implementation

{The maintainer has to give a description of the final implementation and add screenshots if possible.}

Test Cases

Test cases completed at {date} by {user}

• {Test case number linked to Testrail} : {test case title}

Approval

Approved at {date} by {user}.