Provide Rating for LTI-Provider

If you need any help in filling out this wiki page, please visit our ILIAS Community FAQ. And please complete the metadata information in the right column after having created the page.

1 Initial Problem

The amount of possible LTI-Ressources makes it necessary to provide a tool, which supports the decidingprocess. Ratings are implemented in many other ILIAS-Objects (Wiki-Pages, Learning-Modules). 

2 Conceptual Summary

The Rating of a remote LTI-Object (category, course, test) should be transmitted/stored as Part of the Metadata of the specific objects. 

3 User Interface Modifications

3.1 List of Affected Views

• … { Please list titles of all views (screens) of ILIAS that should be modified, newly introduced or removed. }

3.2 User Interface Details

{ For each of these views please list all user interface elements that should be modified, added or removed. Please provide the textual appearance of the UI elements and their interactive behaviour. }

3.3 New User Interface Concepts

{ If the proposal introduces any completely new user interface elements, you might consult UI Kitchen Sink in order to find the necessary information to propose new UI-Concepts. Note that any maintainer might gladly assist you with this. }

3.4 Accessibility Implications

{ If the proposal contains potential accessibility issues that are neither covered by existing UI components nor clarified by guidelines, please list them here. For every potential issue please either propose a solution or write down a short risk assessment about potential fallout if there would be no solution for the issue. }

4 Technical Information

The rating should be stored as part of the metadata Items.

It could be supported, that the rating of remote LTI-Consumer objects is part of the rating process. This relates to Provide Rating for LTI-Consumer

5 Privacy

relates to the anonymication/pseudonymication used by LTI.

6 Security

The Rating of LTI-Objects should be exchanged secured. Maybe the authentication Process of LTI and the pseudonymication implemented in ILIAS could be used for the exchange.

7 Contact

• Author of the Request: Stake, Sebastian [sstake]
• Maintainer: Kohnle, Uwe [ukohnle]
• Implementation of the feature is done by: {The maintainer must add the name of the implementing developer.}

8 Funding

If you are interest in funding this feature, please add your name and institution to this list.

• …

9 Discussion

10 Implementation

{ The maintainer has to give a description of the final implementation and add screenshots if possible. }

Test Cases

Test cases completed at {date} by {user}

• {Test case number linked to Testrail} : {test case title}

Approval

Approved at {date} by {user}.