Feature Wiki

Information about planned and released features

Tabs

Anonymous Comments

1 Initial Problem

At the moment, comments always show who the author of a comment is. There are many sceanrios in which stundetns are required to comment on things anonymously (e.g. to esure more honest feedback). This is curetnly not possible.

2 Conceptual Summary

The comments service should be capable to handle and display both personalized and anonymous comments. Anonymous comments should be displayed just like forum entries that have been submitted without a pseudonym.

Socuh comment are not literally "anonymous" - they should simply be displayed as anonymous. The author of a comment should still be able to edit / delete the comment - that means that ILIAS has to know, who the author is.

3 User Interface Modifications

3.1 List of Affected Views

  • … { Please list titles of all views (screens) of ILIAS that should be modified, newly introduced or removed. }

3.2 User Interface Details

Panel that is used to display a single comment: instead of the letter avatar of the author of a comment, [AN] for anonymous should be shown. If asked to handle (display) a comment anonymously, the comment service should then substitute the name of the author with "anonymous".

3.3 New User Interface Concepts

{ If the proposal introduces any completely new user interface elements, you might consult UI Kitchen Sink in order to find the necessary information to propose new UI-Concepts. Note that any maintainer might gladly assist you with this. }

3.4 Accessibility Implications

{ If the proposal contains potential accessibility issues that are neither covered by existing UI components nor clarified by guidelines, please list them here. For every potential issue please either propose a solution or write down a short risk assessment about potential fallout if there would be no solution for the issue. }

4 Technical Information

{ The maintainer has to provide necessary technical information, e.g. dependencies on other ILIAS components, necessary modifications in general services/architecture, potential security or performance issues. }

5 Privacy

{ Please list all personal data that will need to be stored or processed to implement this feature. For each date give a short explanation why it is necessary to use that date. }

6 Security

{ Does the feature include any special security relevant changes, e.g. the introducion of new endpoints or other new possible attack vectors. If yes, please explain these implications and include a commitment to deliver a written security concept as part of the feature development. This concept will need an additional approvement by the JourFixe. }

7 Contact

8 Funding

If you are interest in funding this feature, please add your name and institution to this list.

9 Discussion

10 Implementation

{ The maintainer has to give a description of the final implementation and add screenshots if possible. }

Test Cases

Test cases completed at {date} by {user}

  • {Test case number linked to Testrail} : {test case title}

Approval

Approved at {date} by {user}.

Last edited: 24. Jun 2022, 18:22, Glaubitz, Marko [mglaubitz]