Extend ASQ: Page Content for Questions

1 Initial Problem

The current implementation and dataset of the ASQ (not yet incorporate in the core of ILIAS) does not offer to page editor content below or above a question. The legacy test / test question pool objects offer this functionality.

2 Conceptual Summary

The data model of the question service will be extended to support page editor content above and/or below questions as the legacy T&A did.
That probably means that it will save the "page_id" from the table "page_question" within the question. Then it can server page editor content the same way the legacy Test and Question Pool did.

3 User Interface Modifications

3.1 List of Affected Views

3.2 User Interface Details

{ For each of these views please list all user interface elements that should be modified, added or removed. Please provide the textual appearance of the UI elements and their interactive behaviour. }

3.3 New User Interface Concepts

{ If the proposal introduces any completely new user interface elements, you might consult UI Kitchen Sink in order to find the necessary information to propose new UI-Concepts. Note that any maintainer might gladly assist you with this. }

3.4 Accessibility Implications

{ If the proposal contains potential accessibility issues that are neither covered by existing UI components nor clarified by guidelines, please list them here. For every potential issue please either propose a solution or write down a short risk assessment about potential fallout if there would be no solution for the issue. }

4 Technical Information

{ The maintainer has to provide necessary technical information, e.g. dependencies on other ILIAS components, necessary modifications in general services/architecture, potential security or performance issues. }

5 Privacy

{ Please list all personal data that will need to be stored or processed to implement this feature. For each date give a short explanation why it is necessary to use that date. }

6 Security

{ Does the feature include any special security relevant changes, e.g. the introducion of new endpoints or other new possible attack vectors. If yes, please explain these implications and include a commitment to deliver a written security concept as part of the feature development. This concept will need an additional approvement by the JourFixe. }

7 Contact

• Author of the Request: Falkenstein, Rob [rob] und Glaubitz, Marko [mglaubitz]
• Maintainer: Studer, Martin [mstuder]
• Implementation of the feature is done by: 

8 Funding

If you are interest in funding this feature, please add your name and institution to this list.

• Project bwILIAS

9 Discussion

10 Implementation

{ The maintainer has to give a description of the final implementation and add screenshots if possible. }

Test Cases

Test cases completed at {date} by {user}

• {Test case number linked to Testrail} : {test case title}

Approval

Approved at {date} by {user}.