Feature Wiki
Tabs
Migration path for question types to ASQ
Page Overview
[Hide]1 Initial Problem
With the Introducing Assessment Question Service a new and independent service for the component Test & Assessment should be implemented. To make existing questions usable with the new service a migration path for every single question type must be created.
2 Conceptual Summary
After migration the “old” versions of pools are still usable in all existing components of T&A, the “new” versions with the components like ASQ, question pools, test players.
The challenging parts in this development are:
- Creating a possibility to migrate further information around questions (like content and context surrounding questions, e.g. taxonomies, page editor information, competences)
- All questions and their contents need to work with ASQ
- Quality assurance & testing (internal QS: we will ask for existing db-dumps to test; external QS: we need testers from the community)
3 User Interface Modifications
- Multiple Choice Question (Single Answer)
- Multiple Choice Question (Multiple Answer)
- Multiple Choice Question (Kprim Answer)
- Error Text
- Hot Spot / Image Map Question
- Cloze Question (also supporting Long Menu Question)
- Numeric Question
- Formula Question
- Test Subset Question
- Ordering Question (vertical & horizontal)
- Matching Question
- Essay Question
- File Upload Question
- Text Order Question
4 Technical Information
{ The maintainer has to provide necessary technical information, e.g. dependencies on other ILIAS components, necessary modifications in general services/architecture, potential security or performance issues. }
5 Privacy
{ Please list all personal data that will need to be stored or processed to implement this feature. For each date give a short explanation why it is necessary to use that date. }
6 Security
{ Does the feature include any special security relevant changes, e.g. the introducion of new endpoints or other new possible attack vectors. If yes, please explain these implications and include a commitment to deliver a written security concept as part of the feature development. This concept will need an additional approvement by the JourFixe. }
7 Contact
- Author of the Request:
- Maintainer: Studer, Martin [mstuder]
- Implementation of the feature is done by: & Studer, Martin [mstuder]
8 Funding
- …
9 Discussion
10 Implementation
{ The maintainer has to give a description of the final implementation and add screenshots if possible. }
Test Cases
- {Test case number linked to Testrail} : {test case title}
Approval
Approved at {date} by {user}.
Last edited: 29. Apr 2021, 15:23, Undisclosed