Show Advanced KnowledgeHide Advanced Knowledge

Counter for Competence Data

1 Initial Problem

• In a competence panel in "My Competences" users are not able to understand how much data underpins a competence record.  
• Users might read the entries as equally grounded in data, which is typically not the case. 

2 Conceptual Summary

In My competences the competence panel entries feature the amount questions that the competence record is determined uppon. 

1.  Appaisal entries indicate a)  number of questions answered, b) number of raters 
2. Measurement entries indicate number of questions answered
3. Self-Evaluation entries indicate number of questions answered
4. Traget Level are not determined record but set goals and thus do not indicate underpinning data. 

3 User Interface Modifications

3.1 List of Affected Views

• PD » My Competencies
• Page-Element "My Competencies" in Portfolio.

3.2 User Interface Details

Lines with new informations have a blue arrow on left side.

3.3 New User Interface Concepts

Completion of the labeling of Scale Bar to display the raters / records.

4 Technical Information

This is technical/conceptual.

• The number of questions is a property of specific object types (tests / surveys).
• The competence management system has no information about this data.
• Furthermore this kind of data would need to persist, even if the corresponding objects have been deleted.
• We would need a concept for historisation of object type specific data.
• And, to make it more complicated, we would need some kind of versioning of this historic data, since older ILIAS versions may store other stuff than newer versions.

All in all a complex task to deal with. This will need some discussions with other developers and I have no idea what conclusions we will make.

5 Contact

• Author of the Request: Samoila, Oliver [oliver.samoila]
• Maintainer: Killing, Alexander [alex]
• Implementation of the feature is done by: {The maintainer must add the name of the implementing developer.}

6 Funding

If you are interest in funding this feature, please add your name and institution to this list.

• optes

7 Discussion

Killing, Alexander [alex], 8 June 2017: Maybe we discuss this in the JF. Currently I cannot fully support this (see technical section). But maybe there is a "simple" solution to this.

@Alexandra: Wir müssen im Zuge dieser Entwicklung dafür sorgen, dass die Daten (Questions + Raters) nicht nur "stumpf" in die Zeile geschrieben werden, sondern für weitere Verwertung zur Verfügung stehen. Stichworte: Aggregation, Vergleichbarkeit, Trennung von Informationen. Ob das eine (personenbezogene) Datenbank an welcher Stelle auch immer braucht,  könnt ihr besser einschätzen.

Bitte auch in ein verständliches Englisch überführen. Danke. ;)

8 Implementation

{The maintainer has to give a description of the final implementation and add screenshots if possible.}

Test Cases

Test cases completed at {date} by {user}

• {Test case number linked to Testrail} : {test case title}

Approval

Approved at {date} by {user}.